[Nmcaver] Article in Science News this week on science of Cave Formations
John Lyles
jtml at losalamos.com
Thu May 4 11:52:07 EDT 2006
---------------------------------
Science News Online
Week of April 29, 2006; Vol. 169, No. 17
Buried Treasures
Constructing—and deconstructing—cave formations
Sid Perkins
In the summer of 2003, geologist Leslie A. Melim and two of her
undergrads were exploring a 6-meter-by-12-m chamber deep within New
Mexico's Carlsbad Caverns. As the team members were on their hands
and knees conducting a detailed survey of the cave floor, one of the
students blurted out, "Hey, what's this?"
[IMAGE] Although scientists have long understood the chemical
processes that sculpt many cave formations, they've only recently
come up with a mathematical model that explains some of the features'
shapes. Researchers also find that bacteria contribute to some types
of mineral deposits in caves.
iStockphoto
"This," says Melim, was an oddly configured carpet of white minerals
lining a shallow basin that had long ago, when the region's climate
was wetter, held water. The sharp, wispy peaks of the carpet were
less than 1 centimeter tall and 1.5 cm across at their bases,
resembling crests atop a lemon meringue pie.
"It was unlike any cave formation I'd seen or heard of, and I was
pretty sure no one else had seen it before either," says Melim.
Considering the location of the find and its appearance, the team
from Western Illinois University in Macomb dubbed the mineral coating
"pool meringue." The group has since found similar formations in two
other dried pools in Carlsbad's lower reaches.
As at Carlsbad Caverns, many treasure vaults lie deep beneath Earth's
surface in cathedral-like chambers, accessible only through narrow
passages, often with fanciful names such as Contortionist's Delight
or Fat Man's Squeeze. In these pitch-black and usually humid
confines, mineral formations range from iciclelike deposits that can
weigh tons to delicate crystals that shatter at the slightest touch.
Although scientists have long understood the chemical processes that
sculpt many cave formations, they've only recently come up with a
mathematical model that explains some of their shapes.
An even fuller explanation of the intricate decor will also have a
biological component, according to researchers who are characterizing
the unusual bacteria that live in caves. In Mexico's Cueva de Villa
Luz, as in many others, moist surfaces bear gleaming coats of
mineral-depositing bacteria, filmy ribbons of their microbial kin
undulate in cave-floor pools and streams, and damp globs of
microorganisms hang from the walls. Some types of mineral deposits
that form in caves appear to be produced by communities of bacteria
or by the environmental conditions that they create. On the opposite
side of the coin, some of the same organisms are threatening
prehistoric cave art.
Dangling deposits
Cave formations come in numerous shapes and sizes, and many of their
names—popcorn, cave bacon, and soda straw, for example—seem
to have sprung from the minds of imaginative—and
hungry—cavers. The two formations best known to noncavers,
however, bear the names stalactite and stalagmite. Pity the grade
school test taker who forgets that the c in stalactite stands for
"ceiling" and the g in stalagmite stands for "ground."
[IMAGE] ROCKY HANG-UP. Scientists have only recently developed a
mathematical model that explains a stalactite's carrotlike profile.
iStockphoto
Stalactites, stalagmites, and other cave deposits form when water
picks up minerals as it percolates through sediments and then seeps
into a cave. If the water has traveled through limestone on its
journey, it typically is saturated with calcium carbonate and carbon
dioxide, says Raymond E. Goldstein, a physicist at the University of
Arizona in Tucson. This seepage can also contain trace amounts of a
wide variety of elements.
In the first fraction of a second after water seeps from a cavern
ceiling, some of the gas dissolved in the seepage enters the humid
air because the cave's air isn't saturated with carbon dioxide. This
process, a gentle fizzing like that in soda pop, causes the water
droplet to become less acidic, Goldstein says. As a result, some of
the calcium carbonate in the droplet crystallizes on the cave
ceiling, and—voilà!—a stalactite is born.
As seepage continues, new droplets hang from this bump and leave
their crystalline residue. When droplets fall to the cavern floor,
the dissolved minerals that they carry often accumulate there as
stalagmites. When a stalactite and its underlying stalagmite have
nearly grown together, the deposits' shapes are almost perfect mirror
images. Further growth melds the formations into a column with a
narrow waist, which continues to thicken as the minerals precipitate
from the water flowing over the surface.
The growth of a stalactite is incredibly slow—typically, it
takes a century to add a centimeter of length. At first, stalactites
grow irregularly, but once they've reached a length of 5 cm or so
they take on a characteristic shape. From the side, the formation
doesn't look like a perfect cone but bulges like a plump carrot, says
Goldstein.
Although scientists had long recognized this distinct profile, no one
had explained how stalactites end up with their bulging shape, he
notes. Now, Goldstein and his colleagues have come up with a
mathematical model that reproduces a stalactite's silhouette.
Earlier experiments had shown that the rate of mineral precipitation
on each small patch of stalactite correlates with the thickness of
the layer of water that's dribbling down the formation. At the top of
a stalactite, where the layer of flowing water may be only a few
micrometers (µm) thick, calcium carbonate is deposited slowly,
says Goldstein. Near the bottom of the formation, where the flowing
water is spread over a smaller area, the film of water is thicker and
crystals form more quickly.
Because the top of the stalactite has a larger diameter and more
surface area than the bottom does, more rock is deposited there
overall. However, the more-rapid mineral deposition at the bottom
portions widens the formation to create the characteristic carrot
profile. Goldstein and his colleagues reported their findings in the
August 2005 Physics of Fluids.
[IMAGE] GOLDEN RING. Cave formations called soda straws develop as
crystals grow from a ring-shaped deposit on the ceiling of a cave. A
drop of water hangs at this soda straw's tip.
Anderson/Darklightimagery.net
When the seepage rate into a cave is extremely slow, mineral-laden
droplets can hang on the ceiling for a long time before they fall. In
such a case, the calcium carbonate crystallizes in a ring shape. The
crystals that precipitate from subsequent droplets extend the ring
into a delicate tube, generating a so-called soda straw that can grow
several meters long, says Goldstein.
Only about 1 percent of the calcium carbonate that's dissolved in the
water flowing down a stalactite remains on that formation, Goldstein
and his colleagues estimate. The rest is carried to the cave floor
within the dripping water. Over time, the deposits from drips can
produce stalagmites.
Although his team's model doesn't address those structures'
formation, Goldstein speculates on how a stalagmite's shape develops.
As stalactites do, stalagmites grow irregularly at first. The
crystals accumulate in a broad, random pattern, probably because the
mineral-rich droplets splash when they hit the cave floor, says
Goldstein. As the mineral layers thicken and the formation grows
upward, the distance through which the droplets fall becomes shorter,
so the droplets splash less when they strike and the stalagmite takes
on a more predictable carrot shape that's often the mirror image of
the stalactite above it, he proposes.
Built by bugs?
Hundreds of types of rock appear in cave formations. The most
abundant ones are forms of calcium carbonate deposited when
mineral-rich waters seep into an open space underground.
Increasingly, however, researchers are finding that many exotic cave
formations are in one way or another associated with bacteria.
For instance, some of the walls in New Mexico's Lechuguilla Cave are
coated with gnarly bumps of various sizes, a type of formation that
cavers have nicknamed popcorn. The smallest bumps are 2 to 3
millimeters across and look more like bacterial colonies growing in a
petri dish than like popcorn, says Hazel A. Barton, a microbiologist
at Northern Kentucky University in Highland Heights. The largest
knobs of the hard, white rock are thumb-size replicas of the popped
kernels of the snack that shares their name.
Microscopic analyses of the bumps and knobs show layers of bacteria
that have been fossilized in calcium carbonate. Barton and her
colleagues have scraped samples of unidentified live bacteria from
cave walls and took them back to the lab. When fed a
calcium-containing substance, the microbes made crystals of calcium
carbonate, the same material that encases their fossilized brethren.
Microbes are present on most moist cave surfaces. However, because
not all such bacteria can be cultured in the lab, it's often
difficult to confirm which organisms, if any, are responsible for
forming cave minerals, says Brian Jones, a geologist at the
University of Alberta in Edmonton who has studied cave microbes.
In some instances, bacteria appear to play a more indirect role,
merely creating the environmental conditions under which dissolved
minerals are more likely to crystallize. For example, quartz pebbles
and rocks in many cave-floor streams are coated with a layer of
manganese oxide–containing minerals that can range from
fractions of a millimeter to a few millimeters thick, says William B.
White, a geochemist at the Pennsylvania State University in
University Park. The predominant mineral in the coatings is
birnessite, a manganese oxide compound that includes traces of
sodium, calcium, and potassium.
Microscopic analyses of the birnessite coatings reveal many
fossilized bacteria, so White speculates that those organisms derived
energy from the manganese dissolved in the water that flowed over
them. During the energy exchange, the manganese ions were converted
to an insoluble form that then precipitated to form the birnessite.
At this stage of research, White says, it's unclear whether the
microbes had a role in the coatings' formation or whether they simply
inhabited the veneer after it formed.
The pool-meringue formation in Carlsbad Caverns may represent a
stronger link between microbes and cave minerals. Scattered
throughout the meringue are smooth tubes 2 to 3 µm long and less
than 1 µm in diameter. That's the right size and shape to be
microbial filaments, says Melim.
Lab results also hint that the filaments have a microbial origin.
Compared with the rock that encased them, the microscale tubes are
more resistant to mild acid and contain slightly more carbon.
Starvation diet
Ecologically, caves are some of the world's most isolated
environments. That seclusion offers stability: In large caves,
temperatures rarely fluctuate, and the humidity in caves receiving a
steady flow of mineral-rich groundwater stays close to 100 percent.
"It's like a sauna, only a lot cooler," says Jones.
[IMAGE] ART IN DANGER. The prehistoric art in many European caves,
such as this bull depicted in France's Lascaux Cave, is threatened by
microbes that consume the ancient pigments.
© Archivo Iconografico, S.A./Corbis
The isolation and stability also make several cave features valuable
recorders of geologic and even climatic history. The ratio of oxygen
isotopes in a sample of carbonate can provide clues about the
temperature at which the cave mineral crystallized. While soil
temperatures at or near Earth's surface rise and fall with the
seasons, these fluctuations are tempered in deep caverns. Therefore,
a deep cave's temperature matches the average annual temperature at
ground level directly above it.
Although useful to scientists, a cave's isolation from Earth's
surface causes problems for organisms living there, says Barton. It's
pitch-black deep inside a cave, so no food chain can be based on
photosynthesis. Many microbes obtain energy by breaking down rocks
and taking advantage of the chemical energy from those reactions (SN:
11/15/03, p. 315:
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20031115/bob9.asp).
Most of the nutrients available to support life are those carried in
by groundwater. Each liter of water seeping into a cave typically
carries between 15 and 50 micrograms of organic carbon, about
one-thousandth the concentration that's considered a starvation diet
for microbes living at Earth's surface. Forced to make a living from
such slim pickings, the cave-dwelling organisms have developed
unusual techniques for extracting energy from their surroundings.
"These bacteria are incredibly starved, but they're incredibly
diverse," says Barton.
With that variety in the face of adversity, microbes have evolved
complex communities that work together to efficiently process the
minuscule quantities of nutrients that flow their way, she notes.
These communities take many forms, including slick films on rock
walls, mats in the cave's streams and pools, and moist globs that
geologists have dubbed snottites.
Microbes quickly take advantage of any nutrients brought into the
cave by human or animal explorers as well as by seeping water, says
Penelope J. Boston, a microbiologist at the New Mexico Institute of
Mining and Technology in Socorro. Ropes installed by spelunkers in
Lechuguilla Cave are being slowly consumed by fungi, she notes.
Tubing used to siphon drinking water from cave pools, if left
dangling into the water, soon gains a coating of microbes that derive
nutrition from organic compounds that leach from the plastic. Even
the hair and skin cells shed by the occasional caver provide a source
of nutrition for cave bacteria, says Boston.
The microbial penchant for consuming any substance with nutritive
value poses a threat to some of humanity's priceless works of art,
the cave paintings that are scattered across much of Europe. Some of
those works date back to the midst of the last ice age. To make their
paints, the prehistoric artists mixed minerals such as iron oxide and
organic substances such as charcoal into binders such as vegetable
oils and fats—appetizing ingredients all, for a starving microbe.
Recent surveys have found a wide variety of bacteria living on or
near cave paintings at several sites, says Cesareo Saiz-Jimenez, a
microbiologist at the Institute of Natural Resources and Agrobiology
in Seville, Spain. Some of the more-renowned masterpieces under
attack include cave art in France's Lascaux Cave and Spain's
Altamira, La Garma, and Tito Bustillo caves. Scientists haven't
worked out lab methods to grow many of the microbes attacking the
paintings, so those organisms haven't been studied in detail.
However, analyses of their DNA provide hints about their family
relationships and lifestyles.
For example, cave paintings in Altamira Cave support microbes from
the group Crenarchaeota, which can be found in many soils but also
inhabit extreme environments such as near-boiling springs,
Saiz-Jimenez and his colleagues reported in the January
Naturwissenschaften. The same paintings also host microbes from the
genus Acidobacteria, which often thrive in acidic soils. Such
microorganisms threaten not only the cave art's pigments but also the
underlying rock.
Attempts to kill or control the art-loving microbes with
disinfectants might not work, say some cave-art conservators. They're
concerned about damage by such cleansers to the rock. Furthermore,
killing some of the microbes might simply shift the balance of power
to an even more destructive set of organisms and thus accelerate
damage rather than prevent it.
The best hope for the cave art, says Saiz-Jimenez, lies in continued
research, which may yield insights into how to inhibit the growth of
microbial communities and how to minimize the damage they're causing.
If you have a comment on this article that you would like considered
for publication in Science News, send it to editors at sciencenews.org.
Please include your name and location.
References:
Melim, L.A., et al. 2004. Pool meringue: A new speleothem from
Carlsbad Caverns of possible biologic origin. Geological Society of
America meeting. Nov. 7-10. Denver. Abstract available at
http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2004AM/finalprogram/abstract_78466.htm.
Gonzalez, J.M., M.C. Portillo, and C. Saiz-Jimenez. 2006.
Metabolically active Crenarchaeota in Altamira cave.
Naturwissenschaften 93(January):42-45. Abstract available at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-005-0060-3.
Schabereiter-Gurtner, C., C. Saiz-Jimenez, et al. 2004. Phylogenetic
diversity of bacteria associated with paleolithic paintings and
surrounding rock walls in two Spanish caves (Llonin and La Garma).
FEMS Microbiology Ecology 47(February):235-247. Abstract available at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00280-0.
Short, M.B., J.C. Baygents, and R.E. Goldstein. 2005. Stalactite
growth as a free-boundary problem. Physics of Fluids
17(August):083101. Abstract available at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2006027.
White, W.B. 2004. Manganese oxide minerals in caves: Microbially
driven heavy metal scavengers. Geological Society of America meeting.
Nov. 7-10. Denver. Abstract available at
http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2004AM/finalprogram/abstract_73813.htm.
Further Readings:
Jones, B. 2001. Microbial activity in caves—a geological
perspective. Geomicrobiology Journal 18(July 1):345-357. Abstract.
Perkins, S. 2003. Attack of the rock-eating microbes! Science News
164(Nov. 15):315-317. Available at
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20031115/bob9.asp.
______. 2002. Cave formations yield seismic clues. Science News
162(Sept. 14):174. Available to subscribers at
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20020914/note13.asp.
______. 2001. For past climate clues, ask a stalag-mite. Science News
160(July 28):55. Available to subscribers at
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20010728/fob8.asp.
Short, M.B., J.C. Baygents... and R.E. Goldstein. 2005. Stalactite
growth as a free-boundary problem: A geometric law and its platonic
ideal. Physical Review Letters 94(Jan. 14):018501. Abstract available
at http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v94/e018501.
Stone, D.A., and R.E. Goldstein. 2004. Tubular precipitation and
redox gradients on a bubbling template. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 101(Aug. 10):11537-11541. Available at
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/101/32/11537.
Zimmerman, J., J.M. Gonzalez, C. Saiz-Jimenez, and W. Ludwig. 2005.
Detection and phylogenetic relationships of highly diverse uncultured
acidobacterial communities in Altamira Cave using 23S rRNA sequence
analyses. Geomicrobiology Journal 22(October/November):379-388.
Abstract available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490450500248986.
Sources:
Hazel A. Barton
Department of Biological Sciences
Northern Kentucky University
Highland Heights, KY 41099
Penelope J. Boston
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, MSEC 208
801 Leroy Place
Socorro, NM 87801
Raymond E. Goldstein
Department of Physics
University of Arizona
Tucson, AZ 85721
Brian Jones
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
Earth Sciences Building, Rm. 2-03
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3
Canada
Leslie A. Melim
Geology Department
Western Illinois University
1 University Circle
Macomb, IL 61455
Cesareo Saiz-Jimenez
Institute of Natural Resources and Agrobiology
Spanish National Research Council
Apartado 1052
41080 Seville
Spain
William B. White
Department of Geosciences and Materials Research Institute
Pennsylvania State University
210 Materials Research Lab
University Park, PA 16802
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20060429/bob9.asp
From Science News, Vol. 169, No. 17, April 29, 2006, p. 266.
Copyright (c) 2006 Science Service. All rights reserved.
---------------------------------
Interested in new developments in science and technology? Consider
subscribing to Science News. Visit Science News Online at
http://www.sciencenews.org/ for access to additional news articles and
subscription information.
More information about the nmcaver
mailing list