[Nmcaver] GUMO fee increase
Jim Evatt
nmcaver at comcast.net
Sat Jul 1 08:41:35 EDT 2006
The 233% GUMO fee increase is not just taxation without representation, as
Bill Ellis suggests, but double taxation as well.
Fair is fair. If we pay to visit federal fee sites, we should receive a
corresponding annual federal tax CREDIT for those federal fee sites that we
did NOT visit during the year, but are paying for with out Federal income
taxes.
The GUMO fee increase will accomplish two things. It will chase more and
more visitors away from their own National Park. It will make the proposers
look good to their Federal bosses (but not the American public) for
suggesting an additional revenue source.
Grand Canyon charges $20 per car for 7 (or is it 14?) days. GUMO wants to
charge a carload of 3 adults over 1000% of that to visit GUMO for those
same number of days: 3 persons times $10 per person per day times 7 days is
$210.
Death Valley National Park charges $10 per car for the same period. They
have nearly 100 times the mileage of roads to maintain. Several times
the personnel of GUMO. Many times more endangered species. Many times the
number of visitors. At least 50 times the number of campsites. Nearly ten
times the land area. Yet they make do. Why can't GUMO?
The equity of this is that the $3 per person per day they now charge at GUMO
is probably a woeful overcharge as it stands, without any increases.
GUMO needs to explain to the taxpayer their mandate for a 233% fee increase.
And until such time as GUMO is specific and definitive in their plan to
spend these monies, and why their Congressional allotment from the General
Fund does not adequately cover those expenditures, this fee increase should
be buried.
Jim Evatt
More information about the nmcaver
mailing list